TUNTUTAN PIDANA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERJANJIAN DI INDONESIA

ALLAN MUSTAFA UMAMI, HERA ALVINA SATRIAWAN

Abstract


Agreement disputes in Indonesia occur due to non-fulfillment of the rights of one party in the agreement by the other party. The agreement is made to serve as strong evidence if a dispute arises in the future. An agreement is a material law that applies to the parties who make it in accordance with the principle of pacta sunt servanda in Article 1338 of the Civil Code (KUHPer). The nature of this material law regulates the parties, but formal law is needed which aims to enforce this material law, which is also known as procedural law. In the event that an agreement is not fulfilled and a dispute arises, it can be caused by a breach of contract, an unlawful act, a defect in the will known in the Civil Code which is resolved through formal civil law mechanisms. It is possible that other legal remedies could be taken by the injured party, namely through a formal criminal law approach. The criminal settlement approach is used with the intention that the party who is charged or sued immediately completes his obligations. Of course, criminal efforts cannot immediately interfere in civil cases without there being evidence that there is a criminal element or a legal basis for the dispute to be directed to criminal prosecution. The formulation of the problem in this research is what is the law of criminal prosecution in resolving contractual disputes in Indonesia? The purpose of this research is to determine the law of criminal prosecution in resolving contractual disputes in Indonesia. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The results of the research state that criminal charges to resolve agreement disputes are very possible provided that one of the parties has been proven to have committed a criminal act in the pre-agreement, agreement and post-agreement stages and with the proven criminal act being the basis for the aggrieved party to add to the claim for an unlawful act. regulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code

Keywords


Criminal; Agreement; Claims

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ariawan, I. Gusti Ketut. "Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif." Kertha Widya 1.1 (2013). R. Sugandhi. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dengan Penjelasannya. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional. 1980;, Maret 6, 2024, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/pasal-378-kuhp-tentang-penipuan-lt6571693c4c627

Hermansyah, Nanang. "Paksaan (Dwang/Duress) Menurut Civil Law System (KUH Perdata Indonesia) Dan Common Law System (Yurisprudensi Inggris) Dalam Perjanjian." Wasaka Hukum 9.1 (2021): 21-35.

Irmawanti, Noveria Devy, and Barda Nawawi Arief. "Urgensi tujuan dan pedoman pemidanaan dalam rangka pembaharuan sistem pemidanaan hukum pidana." Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3.2 (2021): 217-227.

Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, et.al., 2011, Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan, PT.Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Prayogo, Sedyo. "Penerapan batas-batas wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam perjanjian." Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 3.2 (2016): 280-287.

R. Soesilo. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia, 1994.

R. Soesilo. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia, 1986. Maret 6, 2024, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/pasal-378-kuhp-tentang-penipuan-lt6571693c4c627

Rahayu, Ita Sri, and Abdi Wijaya. "Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Pajak oleh Lembaga Paksa Badan Gijzeling." Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum (2021).

Sinaga, Niru Anita, and Nurlely Darwis. "Wanprestasi dan Akibatnya Dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian." Jurnal Mitra Manajemen 7.2 (2020).

Subaidi, Subaidi. "GIJZELING; METODE PENYELESAIAN KREDIT MACET HUKUM PERDATA." LISAN AL-HAL: Jurnal Pengembangan Pemikiran dan Kebudayaan 10.2 (2016): 299-312.

Umami, Allan Mustafa, and Aryadi Almau Dudy. "Realiasi Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Dinamika Hukum Di Indonesia." Parhesia 1.2 (2023): 136-141.

Umami, Allan Mustafa, and Fatria Hikmatiar Al Qindy. "Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jawa Tengah Nomor: 548/Pdt/2017/PT SMG." JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) 7.2 (2023): 1481-1492.

Umami, Allan Mustafa, et al. "Tanggung Gugat Keperdataan Badan Pengawas Obat Dan Makanan (BPOM) Indonesia Dalam Peredaran Obat-Obatan Yang Menyebabkan Gagal Ginjal Akut Pada Anak." Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan 4.1 (2023).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v18i2.860

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 GANEC SWARA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.