PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DEBITUR DALAM EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA SETELAH PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 2/PUUXIX/2021

DARMAWAN TRI BUDI UTOMO, MIEKE ANGGRAENI DEWI, AGNES MARIA JANNI WIDYAWATI

Abstract


This research will attempt to provide an analysis regarding the Legal Protection of Debtors in Fiduciary Guarantee Execution both before and after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. This study employs the juridical normative legal research method, with secondary data being utilized, which consists of pre-existing data. The analytical technique employed is descriptive analytical analysis. The research findings indicate that the Legal Protection of Debtors in Fiduciary Guarantee Execution before the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Equalizing the fiduciary guarantee certificate in Article 15 paragraph (2) and (3) of the Fiduciary Law resulted in the constitutional rights of debtors being infringed upon. The Fiduciary Receiver (creditor) may carry out execution in the form of private sale of the fiduciary collateral objects pursuant to Article 29 paragraph (1) letter c in conjunction with paragraph (2) of the Fiduciary Law based on an agreement between the fiduciary grantor and the fiduciary receiver. In POJK Number 29 of 2014 Article 14, creditors are prohibited from withdrawing fiduciary collateral objects, with conditions stipulated in the fiduciary law also being agreed upon by the parties in the agreement. The execution of fiduciary collateral objects must be based on the determination that the debtor has defaulted and cannot be unilaterally permitted by the creditor, in the a-quo decision of the Constitutional Court, the creditor is not allowed to forcibly withdraw unilaterally, even though the creditor has a fiduciary guarantee certificate. The creditor and debtor parties must agree in advance on the existence of default as stipulated in the agreement

Keywords


Law Borrower; Fiduciary execution; Legal protection

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, silvana liana febry. (2019). “Analisis Yuridis Peran Dan Fungsi Pt. Pegadaian (Persero) Sebagai Lembaga Perkreditan Masyarakat Di Indonesia.” Lex Administratum 3(5).

Arifin, Zaenal, and Adhi Putra Satria. (2020). “Conceptualizing the Regulation Based on Spiritual Values Toward the LGBT Phenomenon in Indonesia.”

Gayo, M. F., and H. Sugiyono. (2021). “Penerapan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Ruang Usaha.” JUSTITIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 8(3).

Gentur Cahyo Setiono, Herry Sulistyo, and Satriyani Cahyo Widayati. (2021). “Cidera Janji Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Jaminan Fidusia.” Jurnal Transparansi Hukum 4(1).

Gozali, Djoni Sumardi. (2021). “Dasar Filosofis Dan Karakteristik Asas Publisitas Dalam Jaminan Kebendaan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan 5(4).

H. Tan Kamelo. (2004). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Yang Didambakan.

Hendra, Maryati Bachtiar; Nurhatika Sari; Rahmad. (2016). “IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 37 AYAT (3) PERATURAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN NOMOR 29 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PENYELENGGARAAN USAHA PERUSAHAAN PEMBIAYAAN TERHADAP EKUITAS KOPERASI DI KOTA PEKANBARU.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum (Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Wisuda Oktober 2016).

Ishaq. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Serta Disertasi.

Martokusumo, Sudikno. (2009). “Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia.” Yogyakarta : Liberty.

Nasution, Bahder Johan. (2016). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum.

Racmadi Usman. (2008). “Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan.” Cet 2.

S.H, Yatini,. (2017). “TINJAUAN PERMASALAHAN GROSSE AKTA PENGAKUAN HUTANG.” Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 1(1). doi: 10.24903/yrs.v1i1.205.

Satria, Adhi Putra. (2020). “Environmental Quality Protection in the Period of Industrialization to Realize Environmental-Based Industry.” UNIFIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6(2). doi: 10.25134/unifikasi.v6i2.1962.

Tri Budi Utomo, Darmawan, Mieke Anggraeni Dewi, and Icha Pratiwi. (2022). “EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA SETELAH PUTUSAN MK No 18/PUU-XVII/2019 DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SEMARANG.” Jurnal Meta-Yuridis 5(2). doi: 10.26877/m-y.v5i2.13535.

Utama, Yos Johan. (2010). “Membangun Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Berwibawa.” Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Universitas Diponegoro.

Wahyunie, Septy Milda, Djoni S. Gozali, and Rachmadi Usman. (2022). “Pesawat Udara Sebagai Jaminan Kredit Dalam Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia.” Notary Law Journal 1(4). doi: 10.32801/nolaj.v1i4.33.

Winarno, Jatmiko. (2013). “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pada Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia.” Jurnal Independent 1(1). doi: 10.30736/ji.v1i1.5.

Yasir, M. (2016). “Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia.” SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 3(1). doi: 10.15408/sjsbs.v3i1.3307.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v18i2.836

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 GANEC SWARA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.