This research is an example of applied research. The aim of applied research is to increase scientific knowledge with a practical aim. In other words, the results of applied research will be immediately used for other practical purposes. The samples of this research are private class students who are taught English directly by the researcher. The number of samples of this research is 4 students who sit in grades 9 to 12 in high school. The research method used is observation, evaluation, and direct-interviews with the samples, then the data obtained are analyzed comprehensively. The result of this research; it is correct that by using the reading repetition strategy can improve the English vocabulary skills of the samples that have been appointed


vocabulary skill, repeated reading

Full Text:



Anisa, I. (2016). The Vocabulary Mastery of the second Semester Students of Widya Dharma University in academic Year 2015/2016. Magistra, (98), 60–70.

Ardoin, S. P., McCall, M., & Klubnik, C. (2006). Promoting generalization of oral reading fluency: Promoting drill versus practice opportunities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(1), 54-69. doi: 10.1007/s10864-006-9020-z

Begeny, J. C., Krouse, H. E., Ross, S. G., & Mitchell, R. C. (2009). Increasing elementary students’ reading fluency with small group interventions: A comparison of repeated reading, listening passage preview, and listening strategies only. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(3), 211-228. doi: 10.1007/s10864-009-9090-9

Berg, K., & Lyke, C. (2012). Using Repeated Reading as a Strategy to Improve Reading Fluency at the Elementary Level. Online Submission.

Bhakti, S., & Marwanto, M. (2018). Vocabulary mastery by using storytelling. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 3(1), 79-91.

Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Fisher, P. J., & Watts-taffe, S. (2005). Integrated vocabulary instruction : meeting the needs of diverse learners in grades K – 5. Leagning Point Associates, 1.

Blum, I. H., & Koskinen P.S. (1991). Repeated Reading: A Strategy for Enhancing Fluency and Fostering Expertise. Theory Into Practice, 30(3), 195-200. Retrieved from http://ehe.osu.edu/tip/

Cunningham, P. M., & Allington, R. L. (2007). Developing fluent decoders and spellers. In Ramos, A. M. (Ed.), Classrooms that work: They can all read and write (pp. 58- 60).Boston, M.A.: Allyn and Bacon.

Hunt, G. (2006). “The Principle of Complementarity: Freedom of Information, Public Accountability and Whistleblowing.” In Open Government in a Theoretical and Practical Context, Ed. R. Chapman and M. Hunt, pp. 43-54, Burlington, VT:Ashgate

Kuhn, M. (2004/2005). Helping students become accurate, expressive readers: Fluency instruction for small groups. Reading Teacher, 58(4), 338-344. doi:10.1598/RT.58.4.3

Musti-Rao, S., Hawkins, R. O., & Barkley, E. A. (2009). Effects of repeated readings on the oral reading fluency of urban fourth-grade students. Preventing School Failure, 54(1), 12-23. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com

Nazir. (1988). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Researchilmiah.com. (2021). Retrieved from http://www.researchilmiah.com

S. Suria Sumantri, Jujun. 1985. Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar

Suyadi, S. (2014). Hubungan Antara Penguasaan Kosakata Dan Motivasi Membaca Dengan Kemampuan Menulis Eksposisi (Penelitian di SMA Negeri 1 Jogonalan Kabupaten Klaten) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Staudt, D. H. (2009). Intensive word study and repeated reading improves reading skills for two students with learning disabilities. Reading Teacher, 63(2), 142-151. Retrieved from http://www.reading.org/General/Default.aspx

Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading. Remedial & Special Education, 25(4), 252-261. Retrieved from http://rse.sagepub.com

Therrien, W. J., & Kubina Jr., R. M. (2006). Developing reading fluency with repeated reading. I ntervention in School & Clinic, 41(3) 156-160. Retrieved from http://isc.sagepub.com

Therrien, W., & Hughes, C. (2008). Comparison of repeated reading and question generation on students’ reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disabilities –A Contemporary Journal, 6(1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.ldworldwide.org/research/learningdisabilities-a-contemporary-journal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v15i1.205


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 GANEC SWARA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.