KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI PIDANA MATI DALAM PEMBARUAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA NASIONAL

B. FARHANA KURNIA LESTARI, JAUHARI D. KUSUMA, JURWAEIS MARJA SEKA

Abstract


This study aims to determine the comparison of death penalty sanctions in the 2023 Criminal Code Update and the old Criminal Code that is still in force today and also to determine the legal certainty of death penalty legal certainty in the National Criminal Code Update. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research method which is legal research conducted using a statutory approach and and analysis of legal concepts by analyzing criminal and penal concepts and applicable laws and regulations in Indonesia related to this research.

From the results of the study, that the comparison of death penalty sanctions in the renewal of the old Criminal Code and the new Criminal Code, namely the old Criminal Code, the death penalty is regulated in article 10 which explains that the death penalty is the main crime and is the highest criminal sanction. Meanwhile, in the new Criminal Code, the death penalty is no longer included in the main crime and changes to an alternative crime with the provision of probation for 10 (sepulu) years. If the death row prisoner shows commendable attitudes and actions, the death penalty can be changed to life imprisonment by Presidential Decree after obtaining the consideration of the Supreme Court. Legal certainty The renewal of the death penalty in Indonesian criminal law can be achieved by referring to Indonesian laws and regulations governing the death penalty. In the new Criminal Code, provisions on the death penalty are regulated in article 98, article 99, article 100 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (3), paragraph (4), article 101 and article 102. This article regulates the formulation of the death penalty in the Criminal Code Reform which is threatened alternatively as a last resort to prevent the commission of criminal acts and protect the community.


Keywords


Policy Formulation; Death Penalty; and National Criminal Code

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atmadja, Mochtar Kusuma dan B. Arif Sidharta, (2000). pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum, Alumni, Bandung.

Dewi, Ni Komang Ratih Kumala, (2020), “Keberadaan Pidana Mati dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)”, dalam Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Volume 6, No. 1.

Hukum Indonesia”, dalam Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Volume 51, No. 2.

Hutapea, Bungasan, (2016). Kontroversi Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Percetakan Pohon Cahaya, Jakarta Selatan.

Jumiati, Agatha dan Ellectrananda Anugerah Ash-sidiqqi, (2022), “Asas Kepastian Hukum Pelaksanaan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia”, dalam Jurnal Ius Civile, Volume 6, No. 1.

Mahmud, Ade, (2021), “Problem Problema Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dalam Sistem

Saleh, Roeslan, (1987), Stelsel Hukum Pidana, Aksara Baru, Jakarta.

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Cet. 17, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v18i2.884

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 GANEC SWARA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.