TINJAUAN KOMPARATIF ANTARA UNDANG-UNDANG HAK CIPTA NO No.19 Tahun 2002 TENTANG HAK CIPTA DENGAN UU No. 28 Tahun 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA
ALINE FEBRIANY LOILEWEN, TITIN TITAWATI, GEDE TUSAN ARDIKA, RAMLI RAMLI
Abstract
This study aims to examine normatively what are the differences between the old and new Copyright Laws. This research is normative legal research, namely research based on written laws and regulations and various literature related to this problem. There are several differences in the arrangements in the new and old Copyright Law, namely that copyright protection is carried out for a longer period of time. Better protection of the economic rights of creators and/or owners of related rights, including limiting the transfer of economic rights in the form of sold flats. Effective dispute resolution through mediation, arbitration or court processes, as well as the application of complaint offenses for criminal prosecution. The trading place manager is responsible for the point of sale and/or copyright infringement and/or related rights in the shopping center they manage. Copyright as an intangible movable object can be used as a fiduciary guarantee object. The minister is given the authority to delete works that have been registered, if the creation violates religious norms, moral norms, public order, state defense and security, as well as statutory provisions. Authors, copyright holders, owners of related rights become members of the Collective Management Organization in order to collect fees or royalties. Authors and/or related rights owners receive royalty payments for creations or related rights products made in an official relationship and used commercially. The Collective Management Institution whose function is to collect and manage the economic rights of creators and owners of related rights is required to submit an application for an operational permit to the Minister. The use of copyright and related rights in multimedia means to respond to developments in information and communication technology.
References
April 2010.
Ajip Rosidi. (1984). Undang-undang Hak Cipta 1982: Pandangan Seorang Awam. Jakarta: Djambatan
Elyta Rasginting. (2012). Hukum Hak Cipta Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Adtya Bakti
https://ascarya.or.id/tujuan-dari-hak-cipta-adalah/,diakses,tgl 3 juli 2023,pukul 13.20 Wita
https://faizalimam.blogspot.com/2015/12/makalah-tentang-perbedaan-uu-hak-cipta.html, diakses tgl 3 Juli 2023,pukul 13.10 wita
L.J. Van Apeldoorn. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita
Uning Kusuma Hidayah. (2008). Skripsi sarjana Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang: 2008. h. 54.
UU No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta
UU NO.12 tahun 1997 tentang Perubahan UU NO.6 tahun 1982sebagaimana diubah dengan UU NO.7 tahun 1987 tentang Hak Cipta.
UU NO.19 tahun 2002 tentang Hak Cipta yang menyatakan mencabut UU lama tentang Hak Cipta
UU NO.6 tahun 1982 tentang Hak Cipta.
UU NO.7 tahun 1987 tentang Perubahan UU NO.6 tahun 1982 tentang Hak Cipta.
William Caxton. (2023). Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Caxton,diakses tgl 3 Juli 2023,pukul 12.00 wita
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v17i3.542
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 GANEC SWARA
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
TERINDEKS
_______________________________
Ganec Swara
Published by UNMAS Denpasar K. Mataram |
Email: ganecswara@gmail com; aminullahmtk@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.