KAJIAN NORMATIF PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR.21/PUU-XIII/2020 TENTANG HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS TANAH

MASYHUR MASYHUR, RIZQI YANIPASI APRIYANDI

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to find out the considerations of the constitutional court to reject the applicant's application based on Law No. 4 of 1996 and the position of the evidence submitted by the applicants in case No. 21/PUU-XVIII/2020 (Evidence P-4,P-5, and P-7). This research is a normative research by analyzing or reviewing a valid and competent statutory regulation to be used as a basis for problem solving.

Case Number 21/PUU-XVIII/2020 which is considered by the judges of the Constitutional Court is that there is no agreement between the debtor and the creditor in which there is no clause on breach of contract and there is an overmacht/force majeure in the agreement, as stipulated in Article 1865 of the KUH Civil law, but in this case it is not included because the applicant has never included a court decision regarding coercion and breach of contract in accordance with Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Article 20 paragraph (1) and Article 14 paragraph (3) of the Mortgage Law, so that the judges of the Constitutional Court rejected the petitioners' petition. In Case Number 21/PUU-XVIII/2020 there is evidence that forms the basis or corroboration of the arguments of the petitioners' petition as for the position of the evidence submitted as follows an explanation of the debtor and creditor agreements, Land Rights Certificates and Mortgage Certificates, Analysis of the decision of N. 18/puu-xvii/2019, the implications of the Constitutional Court's decision No.18/PUU-XVII/2019 on the community and all evidence submitted by the applicant is not in accordance with applicable legal provisions. All evidence submitted by the applicant is clear that the debtor or applicant has not suffered a loss so that the position of the evidence is not in accordance with the applicable legal provisions

Keywords


normative review of the decision of the constitutional court No. 21/puu-xviii/2020

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adrian Sutedi. (2009). Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dan Pendaftarannya, Cet 3, Ed 1. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Ahmad Beni Saebani. (2008). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Arba M. (2016). Hukum Agraria Indonesia, cet 2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Devita Irma Purnamasari. (2012). Panduan Lengkap Buku Praktis Populer, Kiat-Kiat Cerdas, Mudah dan Bijak Memahami Masalah Hukum Jaminan Perbankan, Cet 2. Bandung: Kaifa

Djuhaendah Hasan. (1996). Lembaga Jaminan Kebendaan Bagi Tanah dan Benda Lain yang Melekat Pada Tanah dalam Konsepsi Penerapan Asas Pemisahan Horisontal. Bandung: Aditya Bakti Citra

Fuady Munir. (2013). Hukum Jaminan Utang. Jakarta: Erlangga

Hadi Sutrisno. (2000). Metodologi Research jilid I. Yogyakarta: Andi

Hanitijino Ronny Soermitro. (2006). Perbandingan Antara Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dengan Penelitian Hukum Empirik. Majalah Fakultas Hukum Undip, Masalah-masalah Hukum, No 9, (diperbaharui Oleh Emaculata Hapsari Ira Maria Noviana, 2006) (1991),

HS Salim. (2013). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertambangan di Indonesia, Cet 1. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta

https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5cd91ec75e844/eksekusi-objek-jaminan-fidusiajika-debitur-wanprestasi/

Imam Koeswahyono, Muchsin, dan Soimin. (2014). Hukum Agraria Indonesia Dalam Persepektif Sejarah, Cet 3. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama

J. Lexy Moleong. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian kaulitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Keputusan Menteri Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 5 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan HGB atau Hak Pakai Atas Tanah Untuk Rumah Tinggal yang Dibebani Hak Tanggungan Menjadi Hak Milik

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum acara Perdata.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019

Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XVIII/2020

Mamuji Sri dan Soejono Soekanto. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (suatu tinjauan singkat), Rajawali Pers, Jakarta,2001, hlm.14 dengan Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Op Cit, hlm.93-137 dan Jhonny Ibrahim, Op Cit,

Peraturan pemerintah Nomor 18 tahun 2021 tentang hak pengelolaan, hak atas tanah, satuan rumah susun, dan pendaftaran tanah.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 40 Tahun 1996 tentang HGU, HGB, dan Hak Pakai.

Remy Sutan Sjahdeini. (1999). Hak Tanggungan: Asas-Asas, Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok dan Masalah yang Dihadapi Oleh Perbankan (Suatu Kajian Mengenai Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan), Cet. 1, Edisi Kedua. Bandung: Alumni

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan dasar pokok-pokok Agraria.

Urip Santoso. (2015). Hukum Agraria: Kajian Komprehensif, Cet 5,Ed 1. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v16i2.339

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 GANEC SWARA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

GANEC SWARA DI INDEKS OLEH

 

 

____________________________________________
GANEC SWARA

ISSN 1978-0125 (print) | 2615-8116(online)
Published by UNMAS Mataram | Email: Aminullahmtk@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats