KETERLIBATAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DALAM PENGISIAN JABATAN HAKIM AGUNG DAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA

H. ISMAIL MZ

Abstract


 The involvement of the DPR in filling positions The Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court have the potential to create a number of new problems in the context of the Indonesian state administration. One example is the increase in the authority of the DPR and is very decisive in the selection and determination process of Supreme Court Justices and Constitutional Justices, where this often leads to excesses, namely the occurrence of politicization, collusion and nepotism. In this research, two problems are formulated as follows: first, how is the power position of the DPR involved in filling the Supreme Court and Constitutional Justices in the Indonesian constitutional system?; Second, has this involvement been in line with the principles and principles of power sharing and checks and balances? The methodology used in this research is a normative research method using secondary data sourced from legal materials, while the approach is carried out using a conceptual approach, a case approach and legislation. From the results of this study, several conclusions can be drawn, among others, first, with the involvement of the DPR in filling the positions of supreme justices and constitutional judges as part of the demands for reform that gave birth to transitional democracy after the fall of the New Order regime. Second, the involvement of the DPR institution is a deviation from the principle of power sharing, and does not reflect the principle of checks and balances, because the legislature plays a very important role in determining state agency officials, starting from the selection process to determining officials, while the role of the President is only to inaugurate and ratify officials who has been approved by the DPR.


Keywords


Involvement, DPR, Supreme Court Justices and Constitutional Justices

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asshinddiqie, Jimly. (2008). Pokok-pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi, Buana Ilmu Populer, Jakarta..

Asshinddiqie, Jimly. (2003). Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia setelah amandemen UUD 1945, Makalah Seminar Nasional Pembangunan Hukum Nasional VIII, Denpasar, Bali 14-18 Juli 2003.

Beetham, David (edt). (1994). Defining and Measuring Democrcy, Sage Publication, Ltd London.

Beetham, David. (2006). “Parliament and Democracy In The Twenty-First Century, Inter- Parliamentary Union”, 2006. Diakses dari archive.ipu.org//pdf/ publications/democracy_en.pdf, tanggal 4 November 2021

Cunningham, Frunk. (2002). Theories Of Democracy: A Critical Introduction, Routledge, New York, 2002.

Ehrmann, Henry W. (edt). (1964). Democracy in Changing Society, Frederick A Preager Publishers, USA,

Gerangelos, Peter A, dalam “ The Separation Power and Legislative Interfence in Pending Cases”, artikel dalam Sydney Law Review Vol.30:61, Tahun 2008, diakses dari :www %.austlii.edu.au /au/journals/sydLawRw/2008/ 3.html, diakses 7 September 2021.

Gyong, John Emmanuel,”Good Governance and Accountability in a Democarcy”,diakses paperity.org / p / 59183688 / good – governance – and – accountability-in-a-democracy.Tanggal 04 Desember 2021.

Harijanti, Susi Dwi. (2015). “Pengisian Jabatan Hakim: Kebutuhan Reformasi dan Pengekangan Diri”, artikel dalam Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 21, No. 4, Yogyakarta, Oktober 2015.

Harijanti, Susi, Pengisian Jabatan Hakim; Kebutuhan Reformasi dan Pengekangan diri, Jurnal Hukum Ius Iustum,Vol.21No.4Oktober2014.

Hutchinson. (2012). Terry and Nigel Duncen,”Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research”, Quensland University of Technology, Deakin University School of Law, 2012, diakses dari eprints.qut.edu.au/54819/2/54801.pdf, tangggal 6 Desember 2021.

Indramayu, Jayus, dan Rosita Indrayati. (2016). “ Rekonseptualisasi Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hakim Konstitusi yang Berkualifikasi”, artikel dalam e-Jurnal Lentera Hukum, Volume 4.Issue I, hlm 1 ,8-12, diakses dari https: // journal.unej. ac. id/ index.php/ eJLH / article / download / 5267/ 3986 /, 7 September 2021

Johnson,John K. and Robert T. Nakamura, “A Concept Paper on Legislatures and Good Governance”,makalah untuk UNDP, hlm 1-5, diakses dari https: // pdfs. semanticscholar.org / a8f1 / f6d8a90d97 bff63c3ac166f91d4e0b 187260.pdf, 7 Sepetmebr 2018.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Daring, dalam ( http: // badan bahasa. Kemdikbud.go.id /kbbi/ index.php).

Longley, Robert,” Separation of Power and Check and Balance in U.S Constitution”, diakses dari https://www.thoughtco.com/separation-of-powers-3322394, 1 Desember 2021.

Mahfud MD, DPR Memang Kebablasan, dalam ( http://nasional.sindonews.com/ red/2013/09/18/ 788395 /dpr-memang kebablasan).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2008). Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Edisi pertama, Cetakan ke- 4, Jakarta.

Montesquieu. (1989). The Spirit Of Law, (De I’esprit Des lois), terjemahan Anne M.Cohler et all, Fisrt Publication, Cambridge University Press, UK.

Nugroho, Kris. (2001).”Konsolidasi Demokrasi”, artikel dalam Jurnal Masyarakat dan Politik, Th XIV. No 2, April 2001.

O’Donnel, Gullermo dan Philippe Schmitter. (1993). Transisi Menuju Demokrasi (Transition To Democracy), Cetakan pertama, LP3ES, Jakarta

Putusan MK No. 27/PUU-XI/ 2013.

Republik Indonesia, Dokumen Sidang Komisi III DPR RI tentang Pengusulan Calon Hakim Konstitusi Usulan DPR RI, 2003, 2008, 2009, 2013, 2014, dan 2018, Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI, Jakarta, 2018.

Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 1,2/PUU-XII/2014, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2014.

Savitri, Diah. (2013). “Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Pengangkatan Hakim Agung”, artikel dalam Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. I No. 2 Desember 2013.

Susanto, Mei. (2017). Refitalisasi Peran Publik Dalam Calon Hakim Agung, Jurnal Peradilan Indonesia ( Teropong ), Vo;.6 Juli – Desember 2017.

Tim Penyusunan Naskah Komprehensif, Proses dan Hasil Perubahan UUD 1945, Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan UUD 1945 Tahun 1945, Latar Belakang Proses dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002, Buku VI Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Sekretaris Jendreal dan Kepanitraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2010.

UUD NRI Tahun 1945, sebelum dan Sesudah Perubahan

Warrren, Harris G., Harry D. Leinenweber, Ruth O.M. Andersen. (1963). Our Democracy at Work, Prentice-Hall,Inc, USA, 1963.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v16i1.285

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 GANEC SWARA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

GANEC SWARA DI INDEKS OLEH

 

 

 

 

 

____________________________________________
GANEC SWARA

ISSN 1978-0125 (print) | 2615-8116(online)
Published by UNMAS Mataram | Email: Aminullahmtk@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats