STUDI PEMBENTUKAN RUANG KOMUNITAS PADA KAWASAN CAR FREE DAY RENON, DENPASAR

MADE ANGGITA WAHYUDI LINGGASANI, GDE BAGUS ANDHIKA WICAKSANA, NI KOMANG INDRA MAHAYANI, MADE DWI ARYA DAMAUTAMI, ANAK AGUNG AYU AMITHA DEWI

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to understand how communal space develops in the Car Free Day (CFD) Renon in Denpasar, which transforms from a traffic space into a social space every week. Combination methods—also known as mixed methods—were used in this research. This method includes a qualitative approach through interviews and observations as well as a quantitative approach through surveys and questionnaires. The focus of the research is on physical space, how the space is used, social interactions, and the impact on the local community. The research results show that the distribution of communities in the CFD is relatively even, and the flow of visitor movement does not significantly affect the distribution of communities. Adequate public space, strategic and easily accessible locations, and opportunities for social interaction among communities are all factors that contribute to a positive community response. However, the issues faced by some communities include visitor congestion that reduces the efficiency of activities and the disorderliness of communal space arrangements in CFD. Therefore, gaining a better understanding of how CFD spaces are used can aid in better urban planning, improve urban quality of life, and encourage similar design efforts in other cities

Keywords


Car Free Day; Community; Communal Space; Temporary Public Space

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adhitama, M. S. (2013). Faktor Penentu Setting Fisik Dalam Beraktifitas Di Ruang Terbuka Publik “Studi Kasus Alun–Alun Merdeka Kota Malang”. RUAS (Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies), 11(2), 1-9.

Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.

Bishop, P. & Williams, L. (2012). The Temporary City. Routledge.

Carr, Stephen, Mark Francis, Leanne G. Rivlin & Andrew M. Stone. (1992). Public Space. United State of America: Cambridge University Press.

Francis, M., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012). Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 401-409.

Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.

Haydn, F., Temel, R. (2006). Temporary Urban Spaces: Concept for the Use of City Scapes. Berlin, 12.

Linggasani, M. A. W., & Putra, I. B. G. P. (2017). Pembentukan Identitas Ruang Oleh Suatu Komunitas Kreatif di Ruang Publik (Area Car Free Day) Dago, Bandung. Undagi: Jurnal Ilmiah Jurusan Arsitektur Universitas Warmadewa, 5(2), 27-32.

Madanipour, A. (2010). Designing the city of reason: Foundations and frameworks of urban design. Routledge.

Nafila, O., (2013). Peran Komunitas Kreatif dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata Budaya di Situs Megalitikum Gunung Padang. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Vol. 24, No.1, Hal. 65-80.

Wijayanti, Susi. (2000). Pola Seting Ruang Komunal Interaksi Sosial Mahasiswa Studi Kasus Jurusan Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Undip. Masters Thesis, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro.

Talen, E. (2010). Design for diversity: Exploring socially mixed neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 603-622.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v18i4.1175

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 GANEC SWARA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

slot gacor

https://similarplay.com/

slot gacor

ftik-iainpalopo.ac.id

slot gacor terpercaya

slot

pg soft