KEDUDUKAN HAKIM AD-HOC PADA PENGADILAN TIPIKOR (TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI) DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 48 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN

TITIN APRIANI

Abstract


   This research is a library research that uses data in the form of books, laws, articles, journals and other literature related to the title, while the technique and data collection is by collecting various ideas, theories and concepts of various literature that are centered on the process of comparison between the evidence or other laws. The results of the study concluded that the ruling of the Constitutional Court against the position of the ad hoc judge is appropriate because it gives the same position on a different matter precisely caused injustice.

   In addition to having the authority to check, prosecute, and break the criminal corruption, adhoc judges also have the authority to examine the criminal case of money laundering that the original criminal act is a corruption crime. So here corruption as the original criminal act is often referred to as predicate crimes. It is no less important that the role and authority of the adhoc judge specialising in the association of article 6 letter c The authority of the Court of Law to handle a strict follow-up in another law is determined as a corruption criminal act


Keywords


Position of Judge Ad-Hok, Corruption Court, Judicial Authority

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Alatas, Syed Husein, 1983. Sosiologi Korupsi: Sebuah Penjelajahan Dengan Data Kontemporer, LP3ES Jakarta

Adji, Idriyanto Seni, 2009. Korupsi dan Penegakan Hukum. Diadit Media Jakarta

Danil, elwi 2011. Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana, dan Pemberantasannya. Rajawali Press Jakarta

Friedman, Lawrence M 1984., Element Of a Legal System, New York London: W.W Norton & Company

Syamsudiin, Aziz, 2009. Tindak PIdana Khusus, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Supriadi, 2008 Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum Di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika Jakarta

Adam Chzaawi. 2005. Hukum Pidana Meteriil dan Formil Korupsi di Indonesia. Bayumedia. Malang

Ahmad Mujahidin. 2007. Peradilan Satu Atap di Indonesia. PT Refika Aditama. Bandung

A.Mukti Arto. 2001. Konsepsi Ideal Mahkamah Agung Redifinisi Peran dan Fungsi Mahkamah Agung untuk Membangun Indonesia Baru. Pustaka Pelajar Yogyakarta

Bambang Sutiyoso dan Sri Hastuti Puspita Sari. 2005. Aspek-Aspek Perkembangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Yogyakarta : UII Press Yogyakarta.

C. S. T. Kansil dan Christine S. T. S. Kansil. 2000. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Semester Ganjil. Balai Pustaka. Jakarta

Ermansjah Djaja. 2008. Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Kajian Yuridis Normatif UU Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 juncto UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Versi UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2002. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta

Undang-Undang

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pengadilan Tindak PidanaKorupsi




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v13i2.95

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 GANEC SWARA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

____________________________________________
GANEC SWARA

ISSN 1978-0125 (print) | 2615-8116(online)
Published by UNMAS Mataram | Email: Aminullahmtk@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats