KEWENANGAN BADAN PENGAWAS PEMILIHAN UMUM (BAWASLU) KABUPATEN/KOTA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PROSES PEMILIHAN UMUM DI LOMBOK TENGAH PADA PEMILIHAN UMUM TAHUN 2019

AWALUDIN AWALUDIN, ANTHONI GERHAN, SUHERMAN SUHERMAN, LALU NUGRAHA ADI UTAMA

Abstract


Bawaslu Decision number 02/PTS/PSPP/BWSL.LTH.18.06/IX/2018 in the 2019 Election accommodates the right of former corrupt convicts to nominate themselves as legislators. Meanwhile, the regulations issued by the KPU through PKPU number 20 of 2018 prohibit corrupt convicts from becoming legislative candidates. Regency/city Bawaslu, with its quasi-judicial authority, in deciding a dispute, its decision can annul the KPU's decision or the dispute's decision is contrary to the norms regulated in the PKPU. The aim of this research is to determine the implementation of the Regency/City Bawaslu's authority in resolving election process disputes in the Central Lombok Regency Bawaslu in the 2019 Election. The authors used empirical legal research methods. Decisions issued by Bawaslu have a juridical character similar to the strength of decisions resulting from the litigation process in court. However, what is different is that Bawaslu decisions are final and binding for process disputes between election participants, whereas for process disputes between election participants and election organizers, some are binding and some are non-binding for several types of decisions, so there are other legal remedies that can be taken by The Parties are taking legal action at the State Administrative Court (PTUN)

Keywords


Bawaslu, Election.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bambang Waluyo, (1997), Metode Penelitian Hukum, Semarang, PT. Ghalia Indonesia.

Burhan Ashshofa, (2007).Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Form Model PSPP 22 Putusan Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pemilu, Tahun 2019

Komisi Yudisial, Putih Hitam Pengadilan Khusus.

Laporan akhir sengketa 2019, divisi penyelesaian sengketa Bawaslu Lombok Tengah Tahun 2019.

Mahendra Kurniawan, dkk, (2007). Pedoman Naska Akademik PERDA Partisipatif, (Yogya karta: Kreasi Total Media,

Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad, (2017), Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Cetakan IV, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Phillipus M.Hadjon, Tentang wewenang, Makalah univ.Airlangga Yuridika No.5 & 6 Tahun XII.

Prof. H. Rozali Abdullah, (2009). Mewujudkan Pemilu yang Lebih Berkualitas (Pemilu Legislatif), Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada,

Soerjono Soekanto, (1986), Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, UI Press.

Soerjono Soekanto, Sri Mamudji, (1995), Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v18i1.795

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 GANEC SWARA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

TERINDEKS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


_______________________________

Ganec Swara

Published by UNMAS Denpasar K. Mataram |
Email: ganecswara@gmail com; aminullahmtk@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

    
Stat Pengunjung GARA