ANALISIS PENJADWALAN DENGAN PERCEPATAN PELAKSANAAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PENAMBAHAN JUMLAH TENAGA KERJA DAN JAM KERJA

LALU WIRAHMAN WIRADARMA, ZAEDAR GAZALBA, TETI HANDAYANI

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the factors that cause delays and analyze the time and cost of the acceleration method with the addition of the number of workers and the addition of working hours to obtain a more efficient comparison of the acceleration method for project completion. As for the steps in this study, namely the collection of data in the form of questionnaire results and existing project data, including the Budget Plan (RAB), Analysis of Work Unit Prices (AHSP) and Time Schedule. Factors causing project delays based on questionnaires were analyzed using interest index calculations with validity and reliability testing, in order to obtain the top ranking of factors causing delays with a value of 𝑟ℎ = 0.502 < 𝑟𝑡 = 0.576 with "valid" test results caused by changes in material or material specifications. The results of the analysis of project plan conditions with a duration of 369 days, direct costs of Rp. 11,092,954,636.14 and an indirect cost of Rp. 2,160,276,709.31, and the results of the acceleration analysis with the addition of the number of workers (alternative 1) obtained a duration of 350 days with a direct cost of Rp. 11,092,954,636.14 and an indirect cost of Rp. 2,160,276,709.31, while the results of the acceleration analysis with the addition of working hours (alternative 2) obtained a duration of 364 days with a direct cost of Rp. 11,648,582,543.10 and an indirect cost of Rp. 1,604,648,802.35.


Keywords


scheduling, delay, time, cost.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi, Restu, dkk. (2016). Analisa Percepatan Proyek Metode Crash Program Studi Kasus Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Mixed USE Sentraland. Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, 5, 148.

Anonim. 2021. Contruction Monthly Report Period of March 2021. PT. Ratio Constuction Management. Kabupaten Lomboh Tengah

Budiman, P. (1999). Keterlambatan Waktu Pelaksanaan Proyek Klasifikasi dan Peringkat dari Penyebab- Penyebabnya.Civil Engineering Dimension, 1.

Husen, A. (2010). Manajemen Proyek (revisied). Yogyakarta: Cv. Andi Offset.

Nuryadi, Astuti, T. D., Utami, E. S., dkk. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Statistik Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Sibuku Media.

Rani, H. A. 2016. Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Yogyakarta:Cv. Budi Utama.

Riyani, R., Malzora, S., dkk. Uji Validitas Pengembangan Tes untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Pemahaman Relasional pada Materi Persamaan Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 62.

Sandjaja, I. E., & Purnamasari, D. (2017). Perancangan Kuesioner Survei Galangan. Technology Science and Engineering, 28.

Santosa, B. (2009). Manajemen Proyek Konsep & Implementasi. Yogyakarta:Graha Ilmu.

Saputra, R. Y. (2017). Analisa Faktor Penyebab Keterlambatan Penyelesaian Proyek Pembangunan Mall ABC. Surabaya : ITS..

Teguh, R., & Sudiadi. (2015). Diktat Manajemen Proyek. Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika GI MDP. Palembang.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v17i1.377

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 GANEC SWARA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

TERINDEKS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


_______________________________

Ganec Swara

Published by UNMAS Denpasar K. Mataram |
Email: ganecswara@gmail com; aminullahmtk@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

    
Stat Pengunjung GARA